[1]胡婷业,陆玉和,王 凯,等.高黏度骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效观察[J].介入放射学杂志,2016,(10):874-877.
 HU Ting- ye,LU Yu- he,WANG Kai,et al.The utilization of high viscosity bone cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: observation of its curative effect[J].journal interventional radiology,2016,(10):874-877.
点击复制

高黏度骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效观察 ()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到:

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
期数:
2016年10期
页码:
874-877
栏目:
非血管介入
出版日期:
2016-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The utilization of high viscosity bone cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: observation of its curative effect
作者:
胡婷业 陆玉和 王 凯 鲍秀丽 张劲松 周晓星 杨耳虎 夏 磊
Author(s):
HU Ting- ye LU Yu- he WANG Kai BAO Xiu- li ZHANG Jing- song ZHOU Xiao- xing YANG Er- hu XIA Lei
Department of Interventional Radiology, Chuzhou Municipal First People’s Hospital, Affiliated Chuzhou Clinical College, Anhui Medical University, Chuzhou, Anhui Province 239000, China
关键词:
【关键词】 骨水泥 椎体成形术 骨质疏松 椎体压缩骨折
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 观察高黏度骨水泥经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床疗效。方法 选择骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者80例随机分为两组,每组40例,均行PVP手术治疗,研究组给予高黏度骨水泥,对照组给予低黏度骨水泥,术后3 d内CT复查观察椎体内骨水泥分布和椎旁渗漏情况。用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和日常生活活动能力评分(Barthel)评价两组疗效。比较两组骨水泥注入量、渗漏情况、手术费用和术中X线曝光时间。结果 80例患者PVP操作均成功,术前、术后24 h、术后第7天VAS和Barthel评分两组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),同组患者PVP前后比较差异则有统计学意义(P<0.05)。骨水泥平均注入量:研究组4.60 ml,对照组4.41 ml(P>0.05); X线曝光时间:研究组4.17 min,对照组3.93 min(P>0.05);骨水泥渗漏:研究组4节段,对照组12节段(P<0.05);手术费用:研究组26 132元/节段,对照组925 1.5元/节段(P<0.01),研究组平均多耗费16 881元/节段。结论 采用高黏度和低黏度骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折都能迅速减轻患者腰背部疼痛,提高日常生活活动能力。高黏度骨水泥可减少渗漏,但价格偏高。

参考文献/References:

[1] Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Bollen L, van Erkel AR, et al. Optinmal intravertebral cement volume in percutaneous vertebroplasty for painful osteopprtic vertebral compression fractures[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012, 37: 1747- 1755.
[2] 陆玉和, 王 凯, 王自力, 等. 经皮椎体成形术治疗椎体压缩性骨折128例[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 38: 285- 287.
[3] 何仕诚, 滕皋军, 方 文, 等. 经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折的综合疗效评价[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2010, 29: 1345- 1349.
[4] 黄 昊, 何仕诚, 方 文, 等. 经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松疼痛性椎体压缩骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2014, 94: 2119- 2122.
[5] Kim JH, Yoo SH, Kim JH. Long- term follow- up of percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fracture: minimum of 5 years follow- up[J]. Asian Spine J, 2012, 6: 6- 14.
[6] Wang CH, Ma JZ, Zhang CC, et al. Comparison of high- viscosity cement vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J]. Pain Physician, 2015, 18: E187- E194.
[7] 赵学辉, 舒 勇, 张 伟, 等. 高黏度骨水泥椎体成形术质量骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折30例[J]. 江西中医药大学学报, 2015, 27: 25- 27.
[8] 熊文华, 杨云海, 林卓峰. 高黏度骨水泥在治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折中的临床应用[J]. 河北医学, 2015, 21: 774- 777.
[9] Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet B, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow- up[J]. Radiology, 1996, 200: 525- 530.
[10] Weill A, Chiras J, Simon JM, et al. Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement[J]. Radiology, 1996, 199: 241- 247.
[11] Liu JT, Liao WJ, Tan WC, et al. Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2010; 21: 359- 364.
[12] Wang H, Sribastav SS, Ye F, et al. Comparison of percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of single level vertebral compression fractures: a meta- analysis of the literature[J]. Pain Physician. 2015, 18: 209- 222.

相似文献/References:

[1]王宏伟,何仕诚,滕皋军,等.经皮椎体成形术治疗椎体转移性肿瘤的疗效分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2010,(10):784.
 WANG Hong-wei,HE Shi-cheng,TENG Gao-jun,et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of spinal metastasis: evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy[J].journal interventional radiology,2010,(10):784.
[2].首届全国骨与关节系统及四肢血管介入技术学术交流大会征文通知[J].介入放射学杂志,2000,(01):31.
[3]王路昌,吴春根,顾一峰,等.CT模拟腰椎经皮椎体成形术相关测量参数分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2011,(08):625.
 WANG Lu-chang,WU Chun-gen,GU Yi-feng,et al.The measurement and analysis of important parameters related to percutaneous lumbar vertebroplasty simulated by computed tomography[J].journal interventional radiology,2011,(10):625.
[4]王福安,王立富,王书祥,等. 血管内化疗栓塞术联合椎体成形术治疗椎体转移性肿瘤的临床应用分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2011,(12):1003.
 WANG Fu-an,WANG Li-fu,WANG Shu-xiang,et al.Intravascular chemoembolization combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of metastatic vertebral tumors: an analysis of its clinical application[J].journal interventional radiology,2011,(10):1003.
[5]张 建,邹金梅,邹 容,等. 36例经皮椎体成形术的临床应用分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2012,(10):864.
 ZHANG Jian,ZOU Jin- mei,ZOU Rong,et al. Clinical application of percutaneous vertebroplasty:an analysis of 36 cases[J].journal interventional radiology,2012,(10):864.
[6]黄朝东,贺纯静,康新国,等.椎体成形术在椎体压缩骨折并发神经痛的临床应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2019,28(12):1193.
 HUANG Chaodong,HE Chunjing,KANG Xinguo,et al.Clinical application of percutaneous vertebroplasty in vertebral compression fracture complicated by neuralgia[J].journal interventional radiology,2019,28(10):1193.
[7]田庆华,王 涛,何 煜,等.经皮骨水泥椎间融合术与骨水泥椎间盘成形术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较[J].介入放射学杂志,2021,30(03):264.
 TIAN Qinghua,WANG Tao,HE Yu,et al.Percutaneous cement interbody fusion versus percutaneous cement discoplasty for painful lumbar disc herniation in elderly patients: a comparison study[J].journal interventional radiology,2021,30(10):264.
[8]王志龙,林文俐,梁逸宁,等.微波消融联合椎体成形术治疗脊柱转移瘤研究进展[J].介入放射学杂志,2023,32(04):404.
 WANG Zhilong,LIN Wenli,LIANG Yining,et al.Research progress in microwave ablation combined with vertebroplasty for the treatment of spinal metastases[J].journal interventional radiology,2023,32(10):404.
[9]王志龙,林文俐,赵建强,等.CT引导下微波消融联合经皮椎体成形术治疗脊柱转移瘤的安全性与有效性[J].介入放射学杂志,2023,32(05):446.
 WANG Zhilong,LIN Wenli,ZHAO Jianqiang,et al.CT-guided microwave ablation combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal metastases: its clinical safety and efficacy[J].journal interventional radiology,2023,32(10):446.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2015-11-19)
(本文编辑:俞瑞纲)
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-10-20