[1]唐世伟,陈 俊,王忠敏,等.介入栓塞术对比手术治疗有症状子宫肌瘤安全性及有效性的meta分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2015,(03):200-205.
　TANG Shi wei,CHEN Jun,WANG Zhong min,et al.Interventional embolization and surgery for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids： a meta analysis of the safety and effectiveness[J].journal interventional radiology,2015,(03):200-205.
点击复制

介入栓塞术对比手术治疗有症状子宫肌瘤安全性及有效性的meta分析 ()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到：

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
期数:
2015年03期
页码:
200-205
栏目:
肿瘤介入
出版日期:
2015-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Interventional embolization and surgery for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids： a meta analysis of the safety and effectiveness
作者:
唐世伟;  陈 俊;  王忠敏;  赵新建
Author(s):
TANG Shi wei;  CHEN Jun;  WANG Zhong min;  ZHAO Xin jian.
Department of Interventional Radiology， First Affiliated Hospital， School of Medicine， Shihezi University， Shihezi， Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 832000， China
关键词:
【关键词】 子宫肌瘤;  UAE 手术;  系统评价;  meta分析
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 系统评价子宫动脉介入栓塞术（UAE）对比手术治疗有症状子宫肌瘤的安全性及有效性。方法 计算机检索The Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CNKI 和Wanfang Data等，检索时限均为从建库至2014 年7 月，查找UAE与手术比较的治疗有症状子宫肌瘤的随机对照试验（RCT），并追溯纳入文献的参考文献。由2 位研究者按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价质量后，采用RevMan 5.2 软件进行meta分析。结果 最终纳入6个RCT，共732例患者。meta分析结果显示：住院时间和恢复时间UAE较手术治疗子宫肌瘤短；健康相关的生活质量、患者满意度、术中并发症、1年内的主要并发症及肌瘤复发率，两者差异无统计学意义；1年内的次要并发症和需要进一步干预率（2年和5年）差异有统计学意义，UAE比手术发生率高；受孕率和活产率差异有统计学意义，UAE比手术发生率低。结论 与手术相比，UAE具有安全性好、效果佳、操作简便、易护理、创伤小、康复快、易被患者接受等优点，但是有需要接受再次干预治疗的风险。UAE对患者生育能力的影响、不同特性的栓塞剂对UAE疗效的影响及UAE对多发性子宫肌瘤的疗效，都需要进一步研究。

参考文献/References:

［1］ Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC. High cumulative incidence of uterine leioyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence［J］. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 188: 100 107.
［2］ Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0［M/OL］. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
［3］ Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation［J］. BMJ, 2004, 328: 1490.
［4］ Pinto I, Chimeno P, Romo A, et al. Uterine fibroids: Uterine artery embolization versus abdominal hysterectomy for treatment A prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial［J］. Radiology, 2003, 226: 425 431.
［5］ Mara M, Fucikova Z, Maskova J, et al. Uterine fibroid embolization versus myomectomy in women wishing to preserve fertility: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial［J］. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2006, 126: 226 233.
［6］ Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z, et al. Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy［J］. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2008, 31: 73 85.
［7］ Ruuskanen A, Hippelainen M, Sipola P, et al. Uterine artery embolisation versus hysterectomy for leiomyomas: Primary and 2 year follow up results of a randomised prospective clinical trial［J］. Eur Radiol, 2010, 20: 2524 2532.
［8］ Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Donderwinkel PF, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (Emmy trial): peri and postprocedural results from a randomized controlled trial［J］. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 193: 1618 1629.
［9］ Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Birnie E, et al. Pain and return to daily activities after uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: Results from the randomized Emmy trial［J］. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2006, 29: 179 187.
［10］ Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Birnie EA, et al. Symptomatic uterine fibroids: Treatment with uterine artery embolization or hysterectomy results from the randomized clinical embolisation versus hysterectomy (Emmy) trial［J］. Radiology, 2008, 246: 823 832.
［11］ van Der Kooij SM, Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, et al. Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 5 year outcome from the randomized Emmy trial［J］. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 203: 105.e1 e13.
［12］ Edwards RD, Moss JG, Lumsden MA, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids［J］. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356: 360 370.
［13］ Moss JG, Cooper KG, Khaund A, et al. Randomised comparison of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) with surgical treatment in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids(REST trial): 5 year results［J］. BJOG, 2011, 118: 936 944.
［14］ Manyonda IT, Bratby M, Horst JS, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: impact on quality of life—results of the FUME (Fibroids of the Uterus: Myomectomy versus Embolization) Trial［J］. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2012, 35: 530 536.
［15］ Pisco JM, Duarte M, Bilhim T, et al. Pregnancy after uterine fibroid embolization［J］. Fertil Steril, 2011, 95: 1121.e5 e8.
［16］张大忠， 殷建林， 刘海日， 等． 碘油平阳霉素乳剂和聚乙烯醇颗粒栓塞子宫肌瘤的临床研究［J］． 介入放射学杂志， 2010， 19： 52 55．
［17］ Olufowobi O, Sharif K, Papaionnon S, et al. Are the anticipated benefits of myomectomy achieved in women of reproductive age? A 5 year review of the results at a UK tertiary hospital［J］. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2004, 24: 434 440.
［18］ Thompson LB, Reed SD, McCrummen BK, et al. Leiomyoma characteristics and risk of subsequent surgery after myomectomy［J］. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2006, 95: 138 143.
［19］ Dutton S, Hirst A, McPherson K, et al. A UK multicentre retrospective cohort study comparing hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (HOPEFUL study): main results on medium term safety and efficacy［J］. BJOG, 2007; 114: 1340 1351.
［20］赵振华， 王 挺， 卢增新， 等． 子宫动脉栓塞治疗单发和多发子宫肌瘤远期疗效对比分析［J］． 介入放射学杂志， 2013， 22： 557 561．
［21］ Radosa MP, Owsianowski Z, Mothes A, et al. Long term risk of fibroid recurrence after laparoscopic myomectomy［J］. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2014, 180: 35 39.
［22］ 袁 亮， 李玉伟， 张富强， 等． 两种PVA颗粒栓塞子宫肌瘤的疗效比较［J］． 临床放射学杂志， 2010， 29： 94 98．
［23］王咏梅， 龚长源， 程永德． 海藻酸钠微球血管栓塞剂治疗子宫肌瘤二例［J］． 介入放射学杂志， 2004， 13： 290．
［24］ 史仲华． 海藻酸钠微球栓塞肝脏肿瘤的临床应用［J］． 中国肿瘤临床， 2007， 34： 38 40， 44．

相似文献/References:

[1]姜 曼,赵 卫,姚瑞红,等. 高强度聚焦超声消融治疗子宫肌瘤的临床应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2013,(01):82.
　JIANG Man,ZHAO Wei,YAO Rui? hong,et al. The clinical research of high intensity focused ultrasound therapy for ablating uterine leiomyomas[J].journal interventional radiology,2013,(03):82.
[2]姚瑞红,赵 卫,姜永能.六氟化硫微泡在高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤中的临床价值[J].介入放射学杂志,2016,(10):903.
　YAO Rui- hong,ZHAO Wei,JIANG Yong- neng.The clinical application of sulfur hexafluoride micro- bubbles in treating uterine fibroid with high intensity focused ultrasound[J].journal interventional radiology,2016,(03):903.
[3]鲁仁财,赵 卫,易根发,等.微泡对比剂应用于高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤疗效观察 [J].介入放射学杂志,2018,27(01):71.
　LU Rencai,ZHAO Wei,YI Gengfa,et al.The clinical application of microbubble contrast agent in high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroids[J].journal interventional radiology,2018,27(03):71.
[4]易根发,赵 卫,范宏杰,等.不同子宫位置子宫肌瘤的高强度聚焦超声消融效果分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2019,28(03):280.
　YI Genfa,ZHAO Wei,FAN Hongjie,et al.The influence of uterus position on HIFU ablation effect of uterine fibroids[J].journal interventional radiology,2019,28(03):280.
[5]谢璇丞,范宏杰,赵 卫,等.子宫肌瘤介入治疗现状及研究进展[J].介入放射学杂志,2019,28(09):905.
　XIE Xuancheng,FAN Hongjie,ZHAO Wei,et al.Interventional treatment of uterine fibroids： its current situation and research progress[J].journal interventional radiology,2019,28(03):905.
[6]潘文秋,汤蕊嘉,赵 卫,等.高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤临床疗效的影响因素[J].介入放射学杂志,2019,28(11):1086.
　PAN Wenqiu,TANG Ruijia,ZHAO Wei,et al.HIFU for the treatment of uterine fibroids: analysis of the factors influencing clinical curative effect[J].journal interventional radiology,2019,28(03):1086.
[7]寸江平,赵卫,范宏杰,等.动态血管模型在六氟化硫微泡联合高强度聚焦超声消融富血供子宫肌瘤中的增效作用[J].介入放射学杂志,2020,29(01):51.
　CUN Jiangping,ZHAO Wei,FAN Hongjie,et al.The synergistic effect of dynamic vascular model in sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles combined with HIFU ablation for fibroids with rich blood supply[J].journal interventional radiology,2020,29(03):51.
[8]邝岚琼,许永华,杨利霞,等.T2WI高信号子宫肌瘤信号强度比值和纹理分析预测聚焦超声消融疗效[J].介入放射学杂志,2022,31(11):1081.
　KUANG Lanqiong,XU Yonghua,YANG Lixia,et al.Application of signal intensity ratio and texture analysis in predicting the efficacy of focused ultrasound ablation for T2WI high signal hysteromyoma[J].journal interventional radiology,2022,31(03):1081.
[9]王艳丽,赵 毅,徐 苗,等.氢吗啡酮自控镇痛应用于子宫肌瘤动脉栓塞术的有效性和安全性[J].介入放射学杂志,2022,31(10):962.
　WANG Yanli,ZHAO Yi,XU Miao,et al.Application of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using hydromorphone in arterial embolization of uterine fibroids： evaluation of its efficacy and safety[J].journal interventional radiology,2022,31(03):962.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
（收稿日期：２０１4-０8-19）
（本文编辑：俞瑞纲）
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-03-29