[1]孙 诚,于长路,贾科峰,等.三维路图在经颈静脉门体分流术中导引门静脉穿刺的应用价值 [J].介入放射学杂志,2022,31(04):346-350.
 SUN Cheng,YU Changlu,JIA Kefeng,et al.The application of three-dimensional roadmap in guiding puncture of portal vein during the performance of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt[J].journal interventional radiology,2022,31(04):346-350.
点击复制

三维路图在经颈静脉门体分流术中导引门静脉穿刺的应用价值
()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到:

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
31
期数:
2022年04
页码:
346-350
栏目:
血管介入
出版日期:
2022-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The application of three-dimensional roadmap in guiding puncture of portal vein during the performance of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
作者:
孙 诚 于长路 贾科峰 高忠嵩 宋德钊 范 勇
Author(s):
SUN Cheng YU Changlu JIA Kefeng GAO Zhongsong SONG Dezhao FAN Yong.
Department of Medical Imaging, General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
关键词:
【关键词】 经颈静脉门体分流术 三维路图 常规间接门静脉造影 门静脉穿刺
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 比较经颈静脉门体分流术(TIPS)中三维路图和常规间接门静脉造影引导门静脉穿刺的效果。方法 回顾性分析2018年4月至2021年2月连续121例接受TIPS治疗患者临床资料。根据TIPS术中门静脉穿刺导引方式分为三维路图组(研究组,n=42)、常规间接门静脉造影组(对照组,n=79)。采用Mann-Whitney检验分析两组患者间技术/血流动力学成功率,门静脉穿刺次数、穿刺时间、X线透视剂量,成像辐射剂量及图像质量的差异;Kendall’s tau-b相关系数分析图像质量相关性。结果 两组患者基线差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组技术成功率和血流动力学成功率均为100%。 两组门静脉穿刺针数、穿刺时间、透视剂量、穿刺相关并发症差异均无统计学意义(P=0.30、0.61、0.55、1.00)。研究组门静脉成像辐射剂量(63.1±23.3) Gy/cm2低于对照组(209.9±49.5) Gy/cm2(P>0.01)。研究组与对照组门静脉图像质量差异有统计学意义(P=0.04)。研究组(tau-b=0.79,P<0.01)、对照组(tau-b=0.71,P<0.01)图像质量,均与门静脉穿刺导引效果呈显著正相关。对照组图像质量与穿刺透视剂量呈负相关(tau-b=-0.2,P=0.02)。结论 三维路图和常规间接门静脉造影均能成功导引TIPS术中门静脉穿刺,但三维路图导引辐射剂量更低,可有效减少患者所受射线辐射。

参考文献/References:

[1] Luo XE, Wang X, Yu J, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: three- dimensional roadmap versus CO2 wedged hepatic venography[J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28: 3215- 3220.
[2] Meine TC, Dewald CLA, Becker LS, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement: portal vein puncture guided by 3D/2D image registration of contrast- enhanced multi- detector computed tomography and fluoroscopy[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2020, 45: 3934- 3943.
[3] Authors on behalf of ICRP, Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, et al. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs- threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context[J]. Ann ICRP, 2012, 41: 1- 322.
[4] 汤善宏,秦建平,束庆飞,等. TIPS 术中引导门静脉分支穿刺方法[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2014, 23:640- 643.
[5] Chivot C, Robert B, Bouzerar R, et al. 3D C- arm cone beam CT for targeting the portal vein during TIPS: initial clinical experience[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2018, 106:20- 25.
[6] Rouabah K, Varoquaux A, Caporossi JM, et al. Image fusion- guided portal vein puncture during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2016, 97: 1095- 1102.
[7] Haskal ZJ, Martin L, Cardella JF, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2001, 12: 131- 136.
[8] 中国医师协会介入医师分会. 中国门静脉高压经颈静脉肝内门体分流术临床实践指南[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2019, 27:582- 593.
[9] Qin JP, Jiang MD, Tang W, et al. Clinical effects and compli-cations of TIPS for portal hypertension due to cirrhosis: a single center[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19: 8085- 8092.
[10] Luo SH, Chu JG, Huang H, et al. Effect of initial stent position on patency of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2017, 23: 4779- 4787.
[11] Spink C, Avanesov M, Schmidt T, et al. Radiation dose reduction during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt implantation using a new imaging technology[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2017, 86: 284- 288.
[12] Cam I, Gencturk M, Shrestha P, et al. Ultrasound- guided portal vein access and percutaneous wire placement in the portal vein are associated with shorter procedure times and lower radiation doses during TIPS placement[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2021, 216: 1291- 1299.
[13] Kao SD, Morshedi MM, Narsinh KH, et al. Intravascular ultrasound in the creation of transhepatic portosystemic shunts reduces needle passes,radiation dose,and procedure time:a retrospective study of a single- institution experience[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016, 27: 1148- 1153.
[14] Ketelsen D, Groezinger G, Maurer M, et al. Three- dimensional C- arm CT- guided transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement: feasibility, technical success and procedural time[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26: 4277- 4283.
[15] Luo X, Wang X, Zhao Y, et al. Real- time 3D CT image guidance for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation using preoperative CT: a prospective feasibility study of 20 patients[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2017, 208: W11- W16.
[16] Haochen W, Yinghua Z, Jian W. Intrahepatic arterial localizer guided transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement: easibility, efficacy, and technical success assessed by a case series[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2019, 98: e16868.
[17] Marquardt S, Rodt T, Rosenthal H, et al. Impact of anatomical, procedural, and operator skill factors on the success and duration of fluoroscopy- guided transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2015, 38: 903- 912.
[18] Pillai AK, Andring B, Faulconer N, et al. Utility of intravas-cular US guided portal vein access during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: retrospective comparison with conventional technique in 109 patients[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016, 27: 1154- 1159.

相似文献/References:

[1]安 涛,阮 娜,李文怡,等.CTA融合导航技术在腹主动脉瘤腔内修复及保留髂内动脉治疗中的应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2022,31(11):1093.
 AN Tao,RUAN Na,LI Wenyi,et al.Application of CTA fusion navigation technique in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with simultaneously preserving internal iliac artery[J].journal interventional radiology,2022,31(04):1093.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2021- 04- 19)
(本文编辑:边 佶)
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-05-11