[1]谢宜芸,秦永林.血管缝合器在股动脉大口径穿刺入路闭合中的临床应用 [J].介入放射学杂志,2023,32(02):196-200.
 XIE Yiyun,QIN Yonglin..Clinical application of suture-mediated closure device in closing the femoral artery puncture access used for large-bore delivery system[J].journal interventional radiology,2023,32(02):196-200.
点击复制

血管缝合器在股动脉大口径穿刺入路闭合中的临床应用
()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到:

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
32
期数:
2023年02
页码:
196-200
栏目:
综 述
出版日期:
2023-03-03

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical application of suture-mediated closure device in closing the femoral artery puncture access used for large-bore delivery system
作者:
谢宜芸 秦永林
Author(s):
XIE Yiyun QIN Yonglin.
Department of Interventional and Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210009, China
关键词:
【关键词】 血管闭合装置血管缝合器股动脉预置缝线技术
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 血管缝合器(SMCD)是一类通过经皮装置在穿刺点周围置入缝线的血管闭合装置,可在经皮条件下达到最接近外科缝合的闭合效果。SMCD经皮闭合对于股动脉大口径穿刺入路的微创化具有重要意义。目前SMCD预置缝线技术是股动脉大口径穿刺入路闭合方式中应用最广泛的技术。现有研究评估了SMCD及预置缝线技术的优缺点,以及闭合失败的危险因素,同时提出术中和术后减少出血的辅助方法。术后如何安全有效地对大口径穿刺入路进行经皮闭合也已成为SMCD临床应用的重要课题。本文旨在总结SMCD在股动脉大口径穿刺入路闭合中的应用现状,为今后相关技术的发展提供思路。

参考文献/References:

[1] Etezadi V, Katzen BT, Naiem A, et al. Percutaneous suture-mediated closure versus surgical arteriotomy in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2011, 22: 142-147.
[2] Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Antoniou S, et al. Percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Vascular, 2016, 24: 638-648.
[3] Lee WA, Brown MP, Nelson PR, et al. Total percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair ("Preclose" technique)[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 45: 1095–1101.
[4] Haas PC, Krajcer Z, Diethrich EB. Closure of large percutaneous access sites using the prostar XL percutaneous vascular surgery device[J]. J Endovasc Surg, 1999, 6: 168-170.
[5] Torsello GB, Kasprzak B, Klenk E, et al. Endovascular suture versus cutdown for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective randomized pilot study[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2003, 38: 78-82.
[6] Nehler MR, Lawrence WA, Whitehill TA, et al. Iatrogenic vascular injuries from percutaneous vascular suturing devices[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2001, 33: 943-947.
[7] Morasch MD, Kibbe MR, Evans ME, et al. Percutaneous repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 40: 12-16.
[8] Dimitriadis Z, Scholtz W, Borgermann J, et al. Impact of closure devices on vascular complication and mortality rates in TAVI procedures[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2017, 241: 133-137.
[9] Del Prete A, Della Rocca DG, Calcagno S, et al. Perclose proglideTM for vascular closure[J]. Future Cardiol, 2021, 17: 269-282.
[10] Lee WA, Brown MP, Nelson PR, et al. Midterm outcomes of femoral arteries after percutaneous endovascular aortic repair using the Preclose technique[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2008, 47: 919-923.
[11] Dosluoglu HH, Cherr GS, Harris LM, et al. Total percutaneous endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using Perclose ProGlide closure devices[J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2007, 14: 184-188.
[12] Hayashida K, Lefevre T, Chevalier B, et al. True percutaneous approach for transfemoral aortic valve implantation using the Prostar XL device: impact of learning curve on vascular complications[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2012, 5: 207-214.
[13]Vierhout BP, Pol RA, El Moumni M, et al. Editor’s choice-arteriotomy closure devices in EVAR, TEVAR, and TAVR: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials and cohort studies[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2017, 54: 104-115.
[14] Jean-Baptiste E, Hassen-Khodja R, Haudebourg P, et al. Percutaneous closure devices for endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a prospective, non-randomized comparative study[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2008, 35: 422-428.
[15] Case BC, Kumar S, Yerasi C, et al. Real-world experience of suture-based closure devices: insights from the FDA manufacturer and user facility device experience[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2021, 98: 572-577.
[16] Spitzer SG, Wilbring M, Alexiou K, et al. Surgical cut-down or percutaneous accesswhich is best for less vascular access complications in transfemoral TAVI?[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2016, 88: E52-E58.
[17] Jaffan AA, Prince EA, Hampson CO, et al. The preclose technique in percutaneous endovascular aortic repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2013, 36: 567-577.
[18] Vierhout BP, Pol RA, Ott MA, et al. Randomized multicenter trial on percutaneous versus open access in endovascular aneurysm repair (PiERO)[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2019, 69: 1429-1436.
[19] Hayashida K, Lefvre T, Chevalier B et al. Transfemoral aortic valve implantation: new criteria to predict vascular complications[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2011, 4: 851-858.
[20]Mousa AY, Campbell JE, Broce M, et al. Predictors of percutaneous access failure requiring open femoral surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2013, 58: 1213-1219.
[21] 赵剑波,陈  勇,曾庆乐. 采用血管缝合器治疗复杂型腹主动脉瘤腔内隔绝术一例[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2011,20:616-617.
[22] 黄显军,夏友传,杨 倩,等. 缝线介导的动脉缝合装置致股动脉闭塞1例[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2020,29:57-58.
[23] Kim WH, Shin S, Ko YG, et al. Efficacy and safety of the preclose technique following percutaneous aortic stent-graft implantation[J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2013, 20: 350-355.
[24] Chen IM, Lee TH, Chen PL, et al. Factors in ProGlide? vascular closure failure in sheath arteriotomies greater than 16 French[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2019, 58: 615-622.
[25] Georgiadis GS, Antoniou GA, Papaioakim M, et al. A meta-analysis of outcome after percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using different size sheaths or endograft delivery systems[J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2011, 18: 445-459.
[26] 赖浚兴,谭文峰,彭宇程. 经皮主动脉腔内修复术中不同缝合技术应用的比较[J]. 岭南心血管病杂志,2016,22:177-180.
[27] Kontopodis N, Kehagias E, Tavlas E, et al. The use of a suture mediated vascular closure device to achieve hemostasis following arterial access through previously implanted synthetic grafts[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2021, 73: 496-499.
[28] Baldino G, Persi F, Mortola P, et al. An alternative technique to achieve haemostasis during PEVAR using perclose ProGlide[J]. EJVES Short Rep, 2018, 41: 8-9.
[29] Furlough CL, Desai SS, Azizzadeh A. Adjunctive technique for the use of ProGlide vascular closure device to improve hemostasis[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2014, 60: 1693-1694.
[30] Ott I, Shivaraju A, Schaffer NR, et al. Parallel suture technique with ProGlide: a novel method for management of vascular access during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)[J]. EuroIntervention, 2017, 13: 928-934.
[31] Theivacumar NS, Mi QS, Glasgow S, et al. Pledget reinforcement and traction compression as adjunctive techniques for suture-based closure of arterial cannulation sites in percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair-initial experience[J]. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech, 2021, 7: 183-187.
[32] Lüsebrink E, Stremmel C, Stark K, et al. Percutaneous decannulation instead of surgical removal for weaning after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a crossed perclose ProGlide closure device technique using a hemostasis valve Y connector[J]. Crit Care Explor, 2019, 1: 1-3.
[33] Hwang JW, Yang JH, Sung K, et al. Percutaneous removal using Perclose ProGlide closure devices versus surgical removal for weaning after percutaneous cannulation for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2016, 63: 998-1003.
[34] Au SY, Chan KS, Fong KM, et al. One-year experience of bedside percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation in a high-ECMO-volume center in Hong Kong[J]. Perfusion, 2021, 36:803-807.
[35] Martin-Tuffreau AS, Bagate F, Boukantar M, et al. Complete percutaneous angio-guided approach using preclosing for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implantation and explantation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest[J]. Crit Care, 2021, 25: 93.
[36] Choi CH, Hall JK, Malaver D, et al. A novel technique for postclosure of large-bore sheaths using two Perclose devices[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2021, 97: 905-909.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘 涛,张纪存,张杰峰,等.ExoSeal血管封堵器在急性缺血性脑卒中桥接治疗中的安全性和有效性[J].介入放射学杂志,2024,33(02):122.
 LIU Tao,ZHANG Jicun,ZHANG Jiefeng,et al.Safety and efficacy of ExoSeal vascular occluder in bridging therapy for acute ischemic stroke[J].journal interventional radiology,2024,33(02):122.
[2]钱朝庆,刘淼.超声引导血管腔内缝合多级瘤腔股动脉假性动脉瘤的临床疗效 [J].介入放射学杂志,2024,33(12):1298.
 LIU Miao.Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided endovascular suture for multi-cavity femoral artery pseudoaneurysmsQIAN Chaoqing,[J].journal interventional radiology,2024,33(02):1298.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2021-12-28)
(本文编辑:边 佶)
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-03-03