[1]张鹤,李明华,方淳,等.３．０T时间飞跃法MRA诊断颅内动脉瘤—与DSA对照[J].介入放射学杂志,2008,(09):618.
　ZHANG He,LI Minghua,FANG Chun,et al.Detection of intracranial aneurysm with time－of－flight MRA at ３．０Tesla：comparison with digital subtraction angiography[J].journal interventional radiology,2008,(09):618.

点击复制

３．０T时间飞跃法MRA诊断颅内动脉瘤—与DSA对照()

PDF下载中关闭

• 
• 
• 

分享到：

参考文献/References:

［１］Fogelholm R，Hernesniemi J，Vapalahti M．Impact of early surgery on outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage：a population－based study［J］．Stroke，１９９３，２４：１６４９－１６５４．
［２］Campeau NG，Huston III J，Bernstein MA，et al．Magnetic resonance angiography at３．０tesla：initial clinical experience［J］．Top Magn Reson Imaging，２００１，１２：１８３－２０４．
［３］Stock KW，Wetzel S，Kirsch E，et al．Anatomic evaluation of the circle of Willis：MR angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography［J］．AJNR，１９９６，１７：１４９５－１４９９．
［４］Al－Kwifi O，Emery DJ ，Wilman AH．Vessel contrast at three tesla in time－of－flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries［J］．Magn Reson Imaging，２００２，２０：１８１－１８７．
［５］Gibbs GF，Huston III J，Bernstein MA，et al．Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysm：３．０－T versus１．５－T time－of－flight MR angiography［J］．AJNR，２００４，２５：８４－８７．
［６］Bouthillier A，van Loveren HR，Keller JT．Segments of the internal carotid artery：a new classification［J］．Neurosurgery，１９９６，３８：４２５－４３３．
［７］Nael K，Michaely JH，Villablanca P，et al．Time－resolved contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck at３．０Tesla：initial results［J］．Invest Radiol，２００６，４１：１１６－１２４．
［８］Choi CG，Lee DH，Lee JH，et al．Detection of intracranial atherosclerotic steno－occlusive disease with３D Time－of－Flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at３T［J］．AJNR，２００７，２８：４３９－４４６．
［９］Lin C，Bernstein M，Huston J，et al．Measurements of T１re－laxation times at３．０T：implications for clinical MRA．In：Book of Abstracts［M］：９th Annual Meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine，Vol．２．Berkeley，CA：ISMRM，２００１：１３９１－１３９５．
［１０］Willinek WA，Born M，Simon B，et al．Time－of－flight MR angio－graphy：comparison of３．０－T imaging and１．５－T imaging—initial experience［J］．Radiology，２００３，２２９：９１３－９２０．
［１１］White PM，Wardlaw JM，Easton V．Can noninvasive imaging accurately depict intracranial aneurysms ？A systematic review［J］．Radiology，２０００，２１７：３６１－３７０．
［１２］Schuierer G，Huk WJ ，Laub G．Magnetic resonance angiography of intracranial aneurysms ：comparison with intra－arterial digital subtraction angiography［J］．Neuroradiology，１９９２，３５：５０－５４．
［１３］Deutschmann HA，Augustin M，Simbrunner J，et al．Diagnostic accuracy of３D Time－of－Flight MR Angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography for follow－up of coiled intracranial aneurysms ：influence of aneurysm size［J］．AJNR，２００７，２８：６２８－６３４．
［１４］Cottier JP，Bleuzen－Couthon A，Gallas S，et al．Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils：is contrast material necessary in the follow－up with３D Time－of－Flight MR angiography［J］？AJNR，２００３，２４：１７９７－１８０３．
［１５］Yamada N，Hayashi K，Murao K，et al．Time－of－flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography［J］．AJNR，２００４，２５：１１５４－１１５７．
［１６］Urbach H，Dorenbeck U，von Falkenhausen M，et al．Three－dimensional time－of－flight MR angiography at３T compared to digital subtraction angiography in the follow－up of ruptured and coiled intracranial aneurysms ：a prospective study［J］．Neuroradiology，２００８，２３：３５０－３５５．
［１７］Yoneoka Y，Watanabe M，Nishino K，et al．Evaluation of post－procedure changes in aneurysmal lumen following detachable coil－placement using multi－planar reconstruction of high－field（３．０T）magnetic resonance angiography［J］．Acta Neurochir（Wien），２００８，１５０：３５１－３５８．
［１８］Majoie CB，Sprengers ME，van Rooij WJ ，et al．MR angio－graphy at３T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow－up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils［J］．AJNR，２００５，２６：１３４９－１３５６．