[1]蒋芳勇,韦金儒,黎荣山.TAP技术与单支架技术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的疗效对比[J].介入放射学杂志,2013,(04):272-281.
 JIANG Fang? yong,WEI Jin? ru,LI Rong? shan..T stenting and small protrusion technique versus simple stenting technique in treating coronary artery bifurcation lesions: a comparative study[J].journal interventional radiology,2013,(04):272-281.
点击复制

TAP技术与单支架技术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的疗效对比()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到:

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
期数:
2013年04期
页码:
272-281
栏目:
心脏介入
出版日期:
2013-04-17

文章信息/Info

Title:
T stenting and small protrusion technique versus simple stenting technique in treating coronary artery bifurcation lesions: a comparative study
作者:
蒋芳勇 韦金儒 黎荣山
Author(s):
JIANG Fang?蛳 yong WEI Jin?蛳 ru LI Rong?蛳 shan.
Department of Cardiology, Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, Guangxi Province 545006, China
关键词:
【关键词】 冠状动脉分叉病变 TAP技术 C-反应蛋白 脑钠肽 心脏不良事件
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 探讨对比TAP(T and small Protrusion)技术与单支架技术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的短期疗效。方法 根据冠状动脉造影结果将冠心病分叉病变患者随机分为TAP组及单支架组,所有患者主支血管直径均 ≥ 2.5 mm,分支血管直径 ≥ 2.0 mm。TAP组采取边支球囊扩张后植入支架(TAP技术),单支架组边支球囊扩张,不植入支架。检测手术局部麻醉后、术后1、24和72 h C-反应蛋白(CRP)及脑钠肽(BNP)的水平,并记录心绞痛、心肌梗死等主要心脏不良事件(MACE)的发生情况。结果 所有患者均完成手术。两组的短期疗效比较,TAP组的心绞痛及MACE发生率明显减少(P < 0.05);TAP术后24、72 h的CRP及BNP组明显低于单支架组(P < 0.05)。结论 TAP技术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的短期疗效优于单支架技术,且手术安全性高。

参考文献/References:

[1] Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study[J]. Circulation, 2006, 114: 1955 ?蛳 1961.[2] 成万钧, 周玉杰, 赵迎新, 等. TAP技术与必要性支架术处理冠状动脉分叉病变的疗效对比[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2010, 38: 131 ?蛳 134.[3] Hanefeld M, Nikolaus M, Pfützner A, et al. Anti?蛳 Inflammatory effects of pioglitazone and/or simvastatin in high cardiovascular risk patients with elevated high sensitivity C?蛳 Reactive protein: the PIOSTAT study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 49: 290 ?蛳 297.[4] Vuolteenaho O, Ala?蛳 Kopsala M, Ruskoaho H. BNP as a biomarker in heart disease[J]. Adv Clin Chem, 2005, 40: 1 ?蛳 36.[5] Grabowski M, Filipiak KJ, Karpinski G, et al. Serm B?蛳 type natriuretic peptide levels on admission predict not only short?蛳 term death but also angiographic success of procedure in patients with acute ST?蛳 elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty[J]. Am Heart J, 2004, 148: 655 ?蛳 662.[6] 第一届全国内科学术会议心血管病组. 关于冠状动脉性心脏病命名及诊断标准的建议[J]. 广东医学, 1982, 9: 33.[7] Tsimikas S, Willerson JT, Ridker PM. C?蛳 reactive protein and other emerging blood biomarkers to optimize risk stratification of vulnerable patients[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006, 47: C19 ?蛳 C31.[8] 肖红兵, 顾 俊, 张大东. 早期应用替罗非班对急性心肌梗死急症PCI术后C反应蛋白水平的影响[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2010, 19: 101 ?蛳 104.[9] Hanefeld M, Marx N, Pfutzner A, et al. Anti?蛳 Inflammatory effects of pioglitazone and/or simvastatin in high cardiovascular risk patients with elevated high sensitivity C?蛳 Reactive protein: the PIOSTAT study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 49: 290 ?蛳 297.[10] Asada J, Tsuji H, Iwasaka T, et al. Usefulness of plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels in predicting dobutamine?蛳 induced myocardial ischemia[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2004, 93: 702 ?蛳 704.[11] Hirayama A, Kusuoka H, Yamamoto H, et al. Usefulness of plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration for predicting subsequent left ventricular remodeling after coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2006, 98: 453 ?蛳 457.[12] 林敏川, 高好考, 栾荣华. 脑利钠肽对急诊冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死左室结构和功能的评估价值[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2010, 26: 523 ?蛳 525.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2012-12-10)
更新日期/Last Update: