[1]张炜,徐珉杰,潘龙,等.术前Glasgow-Blatchford和AIMS65评分对介入治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的预后评估[J].介入放射学杂志,2024,33(09):1005-1008.
 ZHANG Wei,XU Minjie,PAN Long,et al.Clinical application of preoperative Glasgow-Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting the prognosis of patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding after receiving interventional treatment[J].journal interventional radiology,2024,33(09):1005-1008.
点击复制

术前Glasgow-Blatchford和AIMS65评分对介入治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的预后评估()

PDF下载中关闭

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
33
期数:
2024年09
页码:
1005-1008
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2024-09-17

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical application of preoperative Glasgow-Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting the prognosis of patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding after receiving interventional treatment
作者:
张炜徐珉杰潘龙袁逸枫韩世龙
Author(s):
ZHANG WeiXU MinjiePAN LongYUAN YifengHAN Shilong.
Department of Radiology,Children′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,Jiangsu Province 210008,China
关键词:
【关键词】Glasgow-Blatchford评分AIMS65评分非静脉曲张性上消化道出血经导管动脉栓塞
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】目的探讨Glasgow-Blatchford(GBS)和AIMS65术前评分对非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者介入治疗预后的评估作用。方法收集 2018年至2021年在上海市第十人民医院介入血管外科接受经导管动脉栓塞(TAE)治疗的59例因非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者相关临床信息。观察患者术前GBS及AIMS65评分对术后结局的预测作用。结果随着GBS及AIMS65术前评分数值增高,患者的病死概率越高;相比AIMS65(AUC=0.630,95%CI:0.494~0.752),GBS对于非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者术后住院死亡结局预测价值较高(AUC=0.823,95%CI:0.702~0.910);GBS截断值>9分时,预测患者住院死亡的约登指数为0.54。结论GBS术前评分对非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者术后住院死亡发生的预测价值较AIMS65更高。

参考文献/References:

[1]中国医师协会急诊医师分会,中华医学会急诊医学分会,全军急救医学专业委员会,等.急性上消化道出血急诊诊治流程专家共识(2020版)[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2021,30:15-24.
[2]Gu L,Xu F,Yuan J. Comparison of AIMS65,Glasgow-Blatchford and rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding:a retrospective observational study in nanjing,China[J]. BMC Gastroenterol,2018,18:98-106.
[3]Kim MS,Choi J,Shin WC. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. BMC Gastroenterol,2019,19:136-144.
[4]Laursen SB,Oakland K,Laine L,et al. ABC score:a new risk score that accurately predicts mortality in acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding:an international multicentre study[J]. Gut,2021,70:707-716.
[5]Martinez-Cara JG,Jimenez-Rosales R,Ubeda-Munoz M,et al. Comparison of AIMS65,Glasgow-Blatchford score,and rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding:performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality[J]. United European Gastroenterol J,2016,4:371-379.
[6]Lau JYW,Yu Y,Tang RSY,et al. Timing of endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. N Engl J Med,2020,382:1299-1308.
[7]Ye T,Yang L,Wang Q,et al. Analysis of negative DSA findings in patients with acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding:a retrospective study of 133 patients[J]. J Interv Med,2019,2:27-30.
[8]肖池金,虞希祥,吴宽,等.经导管栓塞治疗急性消化道出血52例临床分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2013,22:860-862.
[9]吴斌,周全,李建清,等.胃左动脉和胃十二指肠动脉栓塞治疗DSA阴性上消化道出血患者17例[J].介入放射学杂志,2018,27:1148-1150.
[10]张翔宇,柯娥,曹长健.动脉性下消化道出血介入治疗研究进展[J].介入放射学杂志,2021,30:632-635.
[11]Padia SA,Geisinger MA,Newman JS,et al. Effectiveness of coil embolization in angiographically detectable versus non-detectable sources of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol,2009,20:461-466.
[12]Tarasconi A,Baiocchi GL,Pattonieri V,et al. Transcatheter arterial embolization versus surgery for refractory non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding:a meta-analysis[J]. World J Emerg Surg,2019,14:3.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2023-09-28)
(本文编辑:新宇)
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-09-15