[1]田伟玲,孟小茜,廖华强,等.桡动脉穿刺失败后经同侧尺动脉途径行外周血管介入的安全性与可行性[J].介入放射学杂志,2024,33(07):723-727.
 TIAN Weilin,MENG Xiaoxi,LIAO Huaqiang,et al.The safety and feasibility of peripheral vascular intervention via the ipsilateral transulnar access due to failure of transradial artery puncture[J].journal interventional radiology,2024,33(07):723-727.
点击复制

桡动脉穿刺失败后经同侧尺动脉途径行外周血管介入的安全性与可行性()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到:

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
33
期数:
2024年07
页码:
723-727
栏目:
血管介入
出版日期:
2024-07-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
The safety and feasibility of peripheral vascular intervention via the ipsilateral transulnar access due to failure of transradial artery puncture
作者:
田伟玲 孟小茜 廖华强 刘洪超 顾亚峰 黄立宇 董伟华 江海林
Author(s):
TIAN Weilin MENG Xiaoxi LIAO Huaqiang LIU Hongchao GU Yafeng HUANG Liyu DONG Weihua JIANG Hailin.
Department of Interventional Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
关键词:
【关键词】 经桡动脉途径 经尺动脉途径 外周血管介入
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 探讨桡动脉穿刺插管(TRA)失败后经同侧尺动脉穿刺插管(TUA)行外周血管介入的安全性与可行性。方法 回顾性分析了我院2019年1月至2021年12月TRA外周血管介入手术2 546例次,TRA失败共计37例次,其中转换成同侧TUA 27例次,对TRA失败后同侧TUA的穿刺成功率、手术成功率及穿刺入路相关并发症予以分析。结果 TRA失败后同侧TUA的成功率为96.3%(26/27),1例因发生尺动脉痉挛而转换成股动脉入路。总的手术成功率为96.3%(26/27)。无严重并发症发生,轻微并发症发生率为19.2%(5/26)。结论 初步结果表明,对有一定经验的TRA操作者,TRA失败后转换为同侧TUA是一种安全、可行的策略选择。

参考文献/References:

[1] 中国抗癌协会肿瘤介入学专业委员会. 经桡动脉入路外周介入中国专家共识[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2023, 32:205- 214.
[2] Chu HH, Kim JW, Shin JH, et al. Update on transradial access for percutaneous transcatheter visceral artery embolization[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2021, 22: 72- 85.
[3] 江海林,孟小茜,廖华强,等. 经桡动脉途径行外周介入的安全性与可行性[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2018, 27:1027- 1030.
[4] van Dijk LJD, van Noord D, van Mierlo M, et al. Single- center retrospective comparative analysis of transradial, transbrachial, and transfemoral approach for mesenteric arterial procedures[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2020, 31: 130- 138.
[5] Liu LB, Cedillo MA, Bishay V, et al. Patient experience and preference in transradial versus transfemoral access during transarterial radioembolization: a randomized single- center trial[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2019, 30: 414- 420.
[6] Yamada R, Bracewell S, Bassaco B, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral arterial access in liver cancer embolization: randomized trial to assess patient satisfaction[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2018, 29: 38- 43.
[7] Iezzi R, Posa A, Merlino B, et al. Operator learning curve for transradial liver cancer embolization: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2019, 25: 368- 374.
[8] Hess CN, Peterson ED, Neely ML, et al. The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry[J]. Circulation, 2014, 129: 2277- 2286.
[9] Posham R,Biederman DM,Patel RS,et al. Transradial approach for noncoronary interventions: a single- center review of safety and feasibility in the first 1,500 cases[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016, 27: 159- 166.
[10] Bishay VL,Biederman DM,Ward TJ,et al. Transradial approach for hepatic radioembolization: initial results and technique[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2016, 207: 1112- 1121
[11] 江海林,孟小茜,廖华强,等. 不同体位经桡动脉途径行TACE术的透视时间对比[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2021, 30:275- 278.
[12] Jiang H,Chen Y,Liao H,et al. Operator radiation dose during trans- hepatic arterial chemoembolization: different patients’ positions via transradial or transfemoral access[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2022, 28: 376- 382.
[13] Zafirovska B,Jovkovski A,Vasilev I,et al. Ipsilateral transulnar artery approach catheterizations after failure of the radial approach: are two sheaths in the same arm safe?[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2022, 99: 411- 417.
[14] Roghani- Dehkordi F, Kermani- Alghoraishi M, Heshmat- Ghahdarijani K. Crossover from transradial to ipsilateral transulnar access after sheath insertion into the radial artery[J]. Kardiol Pol, 2020, 78: 325- 327.
[15] Kedev S, Zafirovska B, Dharma S, et al. Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2014, 83: E51- E60.
[16] Titano JJ, Biederman DM, Marinelli BS, et al. Safety and feasibility of transradial access for visceral interventions in patients with thrombocytopenia[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2016, 39: 676- 682.
[17] Du N, Ma J, Yang M, et al. Transradial access chemoembo- lization for hepatocellular carcinoma patients[J]. J Vis Exp, 2020: 163.
[18] Sedhom R, Megaly M, Abraham B, et al. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2021, 26: 39- 45.
[19] Kedev S, Zafirovska B, Antov S, et al. Total wrist access for angiography and interventions: procedural success and access site crossover in a high volume transradial center[J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2018, 19: 570- 574.
[20] Fukuda N, Iwahara SI, Harada A, et al. Vasospasms of the radial artery after the transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty[J]. Jpn Heart J, 2004, 45: 723- 731.
[21] Hahalis G, Tsigkas G, Xanthopoulou I, et al. Transulnar compared with transradial artery approach as a default strategy for coronary procedures: a randomized trial. The transulnar or transradial instead of coronary transfemoral angiographies study (the AURA of artemis study)[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2013, 6: 252- 261.
[22] Aminian A, Saito S, Takahashi A, et al. Impact of sheath size and hemostasis time on radial artery patency after transradial coronary angiography and intervention in Japanese and non- Japanese patients: a substudy from RAP and BEAT(radial artery patency and bleeding,efficacy,adverse evenT) randomized multicenter trial[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2018, 92: 844- 851.
[23] Zybulewski A, Edwards M, Kim E, et al. Transulnar approach as an alternative to transradial approach in non- coronary intervention: safety, feasibility and technical factors[J]. J Vasc Access, 2017, 18: 250- 254.
[24] Le J,Bangalore S,Guo Y,et al. Predictors of access site crossover in patients who underwent transradial coronary angiography[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2015, 116: 379- 383.
[25] Hsueh SK, Cheng CI, Fang HY, et al. Feasibility and safety of transulnar catheterization in ipsilateral radial artery occlusion[J]. Int Heart J, 2017, 58: 313- 319.

相似文献/References:

[1]江海林,孟小茜,廖华强,等.经桡动脉途径行外周介入的安全性与可行性 [J].介入放射学杂志,2018,27(11):1027.
 JIANG Hailin,MENG Xiaoxi,LIAO Huaqiang,et al.Peripheral arterial intervention via transradial approach: evaluation of its safety and feasibility[J].journal interventional radiology,2018,27(07):1027.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2023- 07- 28)
(本文编辑:茹 实)
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-07-23