[1]王 浩,孙 倩,周晓美.可视化非阻塞性压迫止血在经桡动脉冠状动脉造影或介入术中的应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2022,31(11):1078-1081.
 WANG Hao,SUN Qian,ZHOU Xiaomei..Application of visualized non-obstructive compression hemostasis in performing transradial coronary angiography or interventional procedure[J].journal interventional radiology,2022,31(11):1078-1081.
点击复制

可视化非阻塞性压迫止血在经桡动脉冠状动脉造影或介入术中的应用()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到:

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
31
期数:
2022年11
页码:
1078-1081
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-12-13

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of visualized non-obstructive compression hemostasis in performing transradial coronary angiography or interventional procedure
作者:
王 浩 孙 倩 周晓美
Author(s):
WANG Hao SUN Qian ZHOU Xiaomei.
Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University(Qingdao), Qingdao, Shandong Province 266035, China
关键词:
【关键词】 指脉氧体积描记波 非阻塞性压迫止血 冠状动脉造影 冠状动脉介入治疗 桡动脉闭塞
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 探讨经桡动脉冠状动脉造影或介入术中应用可视化非阻塞性压迫止血的效果。方法 将2020年9月至12月在山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)接受经桡动脉冠状动脉造影或介入治疗的220例患者中213例随机分为对照组(n=106)和观察组(n=107)。对照组采用常规桡动脉压迫器减压穿刺处止血治疗,观察组采用可视化指脉氧体积描记波监测下非阻塞性压迫穿刺处止血治疗。比较两组患者桡动脉压迫器压迫时长、术后1 h压迫疼痛程度、压力性损伤发生率及术后24 h桡动脉闭塞(RAO)发生率。结果 观察组压迫器压迫时长显著短于对照组[(1.93±0.44) h比(9.66±0.76) h,t=91.166,P<0.001];疼痛数字评价量表(NRS)评分显著低于对照组[(0.76±0.97)分比(3.54±1.27)分,t=17.982,P<0.001];压力性损伤发生率显著低于对照组(1.87%比11.32%, χ2=7.746,P=0.005),RAO发生率显著低于对照组(1.87%比14.15%, χ2=10.937,P=0.001),差异均有统计学意义。结论 可视化非阻塞性压迫止血可减轻患者压迫疼痛程度,降低压力性损伤和RAO发生率,且可缩短压迫器压迫时长,减少减压次数,提高医护人员工作效率。

参考文献/References:

[1] Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention:a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2008, 1: 379- 386.
[2] Barbeau GR, Arsenault F, Dugas L, et al. Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethys-mography: comparison with the Allen’s thet in 1010 patients[J]. Am Heart J, 2004, 147: 489- 493.
[3] Wang Y, Tang J, Ni JW, et al. A comparative study of TR Band and a new hemostatic compression device after transradial coronary catheterization[J]. J Intervent Med, 2018, 1: 221- 228.
[4] Kotowycz MA, Dzavík V. Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2012, 5: 127- 133.
[5] Coyer FM, Stotts NA, Blackman VS. A prospective window into medical device- related pressure ulcers in intensive care[J]. Int Wound J, 2014, 11: 656- 664.
[6] 杨春梅,陈丽芳,陈 祎,等. 血氧饱和度监测在经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后预防桡动脉闭塞中的应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2013, 48:404- 406.
[7] 张 娟,侯海群,席晓红. 非闭塞性压迫止血法预防桡动脉闭塞的研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2015, 30:1140- 1142.
[8] 卢叶玲,肖永祺,杨章丽. 经桡动脉介入术后螺旋式止血器非闭塞性压迫法研究[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018, 33:18- 20.
[9] 赵亚男. 经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后桡动脉狭窄及闭塞的危险因素分析[D]. 广州:南方医科大学, 2013.
[10] 郭 俊,徐帝非,沈下贤,等. 两类桡动脉压迫止血器临床应用效果分析[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2016, 25:577- 580.
[11] Sanmartin M, Gomez M, Rumoroso JR, et al. Interruption of blood flow during compression and radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2007, 70: 185- 189.
[12] 任 静,吕 顺,刘 凤,等. 桡动脉压迫器首次减压开始时间对冠状动脉造影术后并发症影响的系统评价[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35:47- 51.
[13] Bazemore E, Mann JT 3rd. Problems and complications of the transradial approach for coronary interventions: a review[J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2005, 17: 156- 159.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2021- 08- 23)
(本文编辑:边 佶)
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-12-09