[1]刘正立,何 旭,顾建平,等.X线透视导引下经皮大隐静脉高位缝扎结合泡沫硬化治疗原发性大隐静脉曲张113例效果分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2022,31(05):455-458.
 LIU Zhengli,HE Xu,GU Jianping,et al.Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous high ligation of great saphenous vein combined with foam sclerotherapy for primary great saphenous varicose: analysis of its clinical efficacy in 113 patients[J].journal interventional radiology,2022,31(05):455-458.
点击复制

X线透视导引下经皮大隐静脉高位缝扎结合泡沫硬化治疗原发性大隐静脉曲张113例效果分析()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到:

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
31
期数:
2022年05
页码:
455-458
栏目:
血管介入
出版日期:
2022-07-19

文章信息/Info

Title:
Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous high ligation of great saphenous vein combined with foam sclerotherapy for primary great saphenous varicose: analysis of its clinical efficacy in 113 patients
作者:
刘正立 何 旭 顾建平 付冠琦 公茂峰 赵伯翔 孔 杰
Author(s):
LIU Zhengli HE Xu GU Jianping FU Guanqi GONG Maofeng ZHAO Boxiang KONG Jie.
Department of Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Nanjing Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Municipal First Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210006, China
关键词:
【关键词】 X线透视导引 经皮高位缝扎术 大隐静脉曲张 泡沫硬化疗法
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 评价X线透视导引下经皮高位缝扎结合泡沫硬化治疗原发性大隐静脉(GSV)曲张的有效性和安全性。方法 回顾性分析2019年4月1日至10月31日在南京医科大学附属南京医院接受X线透视导引下经皮GSV高位缝扎结合泡沫硬化术治疗的113例(133条肢体)原发性GSV曲张患者临床资料。其中男60例,女53例,年龄为(62.1±10.8)岁。透视导引下高位缝扎GSV近端,同时行泡沫硬化治疗。术后1、3、6、12个月随访,超声评估GSV闭塞率及相关并发症发生率,术后12个月复查评估静脉疾病临床严重度评分(VCSS),并与术前VCSS比较。结果 133条患肢手术均获成功。共112条患肢(84.07%)获12个月随访,103条患肢(91.96%)GSV维持闭塞;VCSS由术前4.71±2.15改善至0.74±0.60(V=6 328,P<0.01);16条患肢出现血栓性静脉炎,38条患肢出现缝扎处疼痛,均在2周内自行缓解;所有患者均未出现下肢深静脉血栓形成,无严重并发症发生。结论 X线透视导引下经皮高位缝扎结合泡沫硬化治疗GSV曲张操作简单、安全有效,GSV闭塞率与静脉热消融相似。

参考文献/References:

[1] 赵 军,董国祥. 下肢静脉曲张伴原发性深静脉瓣膜功能不全手术方法的探讨[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2002, 17:20- 21.
[2] Perkins JM. Standard varicose vein surgery[J]. Phlebology, 2009, 24 (Suppl 1): 34- 41.
[3] Leo M, Stefano R, Raffaele AI. Foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein in association with pre- terminal saphenous junction ligation/division as an office- based procedure: 12- month results[J]. Phlebology, 2018, 33: 321- 329.
[4] Morris WT. Recovery after ultrasound- guided foam sclerotherapy compared with conventional surgery for varicose veins[J]. Br J Surg, 2010, 97: 457- 458.
[5] Bountouroglou DG, Azzam M, Kakkos SK, et al. Ultrasound- guided foam sclerotherapy combined with sapheno- femoral ligation compared to surgical treatment of varicose veins: early results of a randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2006, 31: 93- 100.
[6] Coleridge Smith P. Foam and liquid sclerotherapy for varicose veins[J]. Phlebology, 2009, 24(Suppl 1): 62- 72.
[7] Venermo M, Saarinen J, Eskelinen E, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound- guided foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins[J]. Br J Surg, 2016, 103: 1438- 1444.
[8] Vahaaho S, Halmesmaki K, Alback A, et al. Five- year follow- up of a randomized clinical trial comparing open surgery, foam sclerotherapy and endovenous laser ablation for great saphenous varicose veins[J]. Br J Surg, 2018, 105: 686- 691.
[9] 何 旭,顾建平,楼文胜,等. 介入法腔内射频闭合术治疗大隐静脉曲张[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2008, 17:33- 36.
[10] Siribumrungwong B, Srikuea K, Orrapin S, et al. Endovenous ablation and surgery in great saphenous vein reflux: a systematic review and network meta- analysis of randomised controlled trials protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9: e024813.
[11] Biemans AA, Kockaert M, Akkersdijk GP, et al. Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2013, 58: 727.e1- 734.e1.
[12] Kheirelseid E, Crowe G, Sehgal R, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating long- term outcomes of endovenous management of lower extremity varicose veins[J]. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 2018, 6: 256- 270.
[13] Kaygin MA, Halici U. Evaluation of liquid or foam sclerotherapy in small varicose veins(ceap c1) with venous clinical severity score[J]. Rev Assoc Med Bras, 2018, 64: 1117- 1121.
[14] Disselhoff BC, der Kinderen DJ, Kelder JC, et al. Five- year results of a randomised clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with and without ligation of the saphenofemoral junction[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2011, 41: 685- 690.
[15] 杨 锦,陈云玲,郭伟昌,等. 泡沫硬化剂与传统手术治疗下肢大隐静脉曲张的卫生经济学比较[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2020, 29:1235- 1239.
[16] Marsden G, Perry M, Bradbury A, et al. A cost- effectiveness analysis of surgery, endothermal ablation, ultrasound- guided foam sclerotherapy and compression stockings for symptomatic varicose veins[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2015, 50: 794- 801.
[17] Epstein D, Onida S, Bootun R, et al. Cost- effectiveness of current and emerging treatments of varicose veins[J]. Value Health, 2018, 21: 911- 920.
[18] 刘 洪,赵 渝. 下肢静脉曲张微创治疗现状[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2020, 27:400- 403.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2021- 03- 20)
(本文编辑:边 佶)
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-19