[1]王 健,曹 刚,郑 寅,等.经远端桡动脉路径行脑血管造影的安全性和有效性:系统评价和Meta分析 [J].介入放射学杂志,2024,33(04):355-362.
 WANG Jian,CAO Gang,ZHENG Yin,et al.The safety and effectiveness of cerebral angiography via distal radial access: systematic evaluation and meta-analysis[J].journal interventional radiology,2024,33(04):355-362.
点击复制

经远端桡动脉路径行脑血管造影的安全性和有效性:系统评价和Meta分析


()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到:

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
33
期数:
2024年04
页码:
355-362
栏目:
神经介入
出版日期:
2024-05-04

文章信息/Info

Title:
The safety and effectiveness of cerebral angiography via distal radial access: systematic evaluation and meta-analysis
作者:
王 健 曹 刚 郑 寅 曹 竣 裴 芳 蔡华秀 李茂港 刘伟斌
Author(s):
WANG Jian CAO Gang ZHENG Yin CAO Jun PEI Fang CAI Huaxiu LI Maogang LIU Weibin.
Department of Neurology, Ganzhou Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Ganzhou Municipal Hospital), Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province 341000, China
关键词:
【关键词】 鼻烟壶 远端桡动脉 脑血管造影
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 通过系统评价和Meta分析评估经远端桡动脉路径(distal radial access,DRA)行脑血管造影的安全性和有效性。很多研究已经表明,经DRA行冠脉造影(coronary angiography,CAG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)是安全有效的。经DRA行脑血管造影的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。方法 检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、万方、中国知网、维普数据库建库以来至2023年5月1日有关经DRA行脑血管造影的文献,通过文献筛选、数据提取和文献质量评价,采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。结果 检索到239项研究,最终纳入12项研究进行分析(共858例患者)。路径成功率为0.96(95% CI:0.94~0.98),异质性明显(I2= 64.4%)。路径相关并发症发生率为0.03(95% CI: 0.01~0.05),异质性较低(I2=35.4%)。部分研究的循证医学证据等级较低。结论 DRA完全可以作为脑血管造影的可选路径,经DRA行脑血管造影是安全有效的。

参考文献/References:

[1] Oneissi M, Sweid A, Tjoumakaris S, et al. Access- Site compli-cations in transfemoral neuroendovascular procedures: a systematic review of incidence rates and management strategies[J]. Oper Neurosurg(Hagerstown), 2020, 19: 353- 363.
[2] Ruzsa Z, Nemes B, Pinter L, et al. A randomised comparison of transradial and transfemoral approach for carotid artery stenting: RADCAR (RADial access for CARotid artery stenting) study[J]. EuroIntervention, 2014, 10: 381- 391.
[3] Bhatia K, Guest W, Lee H, et al. Radial vs. femoral artery access for procedural success in diagnostic cerebral angiography:a randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2021, 31: 1083- 1091.
[4] Son C, Tavakoli S, Mahadev V. Systematic review of transradial access for flow diversion of intracranial aneurysms[J]. World Neurosurg, 2021, 151: 6- 11.
[5] Sweid A, Das S, Weinberg JH, et al. Transradial approach for diagnostic cerebral angiograms in the elderly: a comparative observational study[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2020, 12: 1235- 1241.
[6] Wang Z, Xia J, Wang W, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for cerebral angiography: a prospective comparison[J]. J Interv Med, 2019, 2: 31- 34.
[7] Bernat I, Aminian A, Pancholy S, et al. Best practices for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial diagnostic angiography and intervention: an international consensus paper[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2019, 12: 2235- 2246.
[8] Brunet MC, Chen SH, Sur S, et al. Distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for diagnostic cerebral angiography[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11: 710- 713.
[9] Chalouhi N, Sweid A, Al Saiegh F, et al. Feasibility and initial experience of left radial approach for diagnostic neuroangio-graphy[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 1089.
[10] Patel P, Majmundar N, Bach I, et al. Distal transradial access in the anatomic snuffbox for diagnostic cerebral angiography[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2019, 40: 1526- 1528.
[11] Chivot C, Bouzerar R, Yzet T. A novel technique to perform cerebral angiography via the left radial approach: an 80 patients series[J]. J Neuroradiol, 2023, 50: 93- 98.
[12] Hoffman H, Bunch KM, Mikhailova T, et al. Comparison of the safety, efficacy, and procedural characteristics associated with proximal and distal radial access for diagnostic cerebral angiography[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2022, 31: 106204.
[13] Saito S, Hasegawa H, Ota T, et al. Safety and feasibility of the distal transradial approach: a novel technique for diagnostic cerebral angiography[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2020, 26: 713- 718.
[14] Hoffman H, Bunch KM, Mikhailova T, et al. Transition from proximal to distal radial access for diagnostic cerebral angio-graphy: learning curve analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2021, 152: e484- e491.
[15] 佘振垒,李婷婷,王小虎,等. 经远端桡动脉路径行全脑血管造影术可行性分析[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2020, 46:351- 353.
[16] 朱灿敏,李 强,张细六,等. 经远端桡动脉穿刺行脑血管造影的临床应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 7:305- 309.
[17] 陆 彬,项 崇,袁雪松,等. 经远端桡动脉入路在脑血管造影术中的临床应用价值[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26:3378- 3382.
[18] 吴中华,陈 诚,高尚艳,等. 经远端桡动脉入路行诊断性脑血管造影的临床应用[J]. 南通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43:81- 83.
[19] 佘振垒,王小虎,瞿珍清. 经远端桡动脉路径行全脑血管造影术临床分析[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2020, 23:863- 866.
[20] 何晓芬,郭 旭,范承哲,等. 神经介入患者远端桡动脉入路诊疗安全性和可行性[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2022, 31:954- 957.
[21] Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, et al. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports[J]. BMJ Evid Based Med, 2018, 23: 60- 63.
[22] 中国医师协会神经外科医师分会神经介入专业委员会,中国医师协会介入医师分会神经介入专业委员会,中华医学会神经外科学分会神经介入专业委员会,等. 经桡动脉入路神经介入诊疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2022, 38:980- 989.
[23] Roh JW,Kim Y,Lee OH,et al. The learning curve of the distal radial access for coronary intervention[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 13217.
[24] Mori S, Hirano K, Yamawaki M, et al. A comparative analysis between ultrasound- guided and conventional distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention[J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2020, 2020: 7342732.
[25] 《经远端桡动脉行冠状动脉介入诊疗中国专家共识》专家组,大拇指俱乐部. 经远端桡动脉行冠状动脉介入诊疗中国专家共识[J]. 中国介入心脏病学杂志, 2020, 28:667- 674.
[26] Korotkikh A, Babunashvili A, Kaledin A, et al. Distal radiation access as an alternative to conventional radial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (according to TENDERA trial)[J]. Curr Probl Cardiol, 2023, 48: 101546.
[27] Kühn AL, Singh J, Moholkar VM, et al. Distal radial artery (snuffbox) access for carotid artery stenting: technical pearls and procedural set- up[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2021, 27: 241- 248.
[28] Kühn AL, Singh J, de Macedo RK, et al. Distal radial artery (snuffbox) access for intracranial aneurysm treatment using the Woven EndoBridge(WEB) device[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2020, 81:310- 315.
[29] Cao G, Cai HX, Cao J. Advancement in coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention using the distal transradial artery access in acute coronary syndrome and complex coronary artery disease[J]. Anatol J Cardiol, 2022, 26: 163- 171.
[30] Hoffman H, Jalal MS, Masoud HE, et al. Distal transradial access for diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointervention: systematic review and meta- analysis[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2021, 42: 888- 895.
[31] 郭 丹,高 跃,柳暗明,等. 经远端桡动脉路径行全脑血管造影及神经介入治疗:系统评价和meta分析[J]. 国际脑血管病杂志, 2022, 30:194- 200.


相似文献/References:

[1]郑 寅,蔡华秀,温咏康,等.经远端桡动脉路径行冠脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和有效性Meta分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2023,32(06):533.
 ZHENG Yin,CAI Huaxiu,WEN Yongkang,et al.The safety and effectiveness of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal radial access: a meta-analysis[J].journal interventional radiology,2023,32(04):533.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2023- 07- 06)
(本文编辑:茹 实)
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-05-04