[1]刘伟丽,廉哲勋,李大成,等. 支架精显技术在冠状动脉支架植入术中的应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2020,29(07):659-663.
 LIU Weili,LIAN Zhexun,LI Dacheng,et al.Application of enhanced stent visualization technology in coronary artery stent implantation[J].journal interventional radiology,2020,29(07):659-663.
点击复制

 支架精显技术在冠状动脉支架植入术中的应用()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到:

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
29
期数:
2020年07
页码:
659-663
栏目:
心脏介入
出版日期:
2020-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of enhanced stent visualization technology in coronary artery stent implantation
作者:
刘伟丽 廉哲勋 李大成 张 岩 徐美玲 孟 真 綦俊辉 杨 红谭好飞 李燕超 付军桦
Author(s):
LIU Weili LIAN Zhexun LI Dacheng ZHANG Yan XU Meiling MENG Zhen QI Junhui YANG Hong TAN Haofei LI Yanchao FU Junhua.
Interventional Operation Room, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province 266003, China
关键词:
【关键词】 冠状动脉造影定量分析 支架精显技术 血管内超声 经皮冠状动脉介入术
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 探讨冠状动脉造影定量分析(QCA)、支架精显(StentViz)和血管内超声(IVUS)在经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)中评价支架可视性和膨胀性的应用。 方法 收集2016年5月至2018年11月同时接受StentViz和IVUS检查的PCI患者30例。分别在QCA、StentViz和IVUS图像中对植入的33枚支架最小直径、最大直径进行测量,计算支架偏心指数,并进行不同方法间比较分析。对33枚支架共143幅StentViz影像作支架可视性分级评价。 结果 QCA测量的支架最小直径、最大直径均显著大于StentViz、IVUS测量(P<0.05),支架偏心指数均显著低于StentViz、IVUS测量(P<0.05);StentViz测量的上述指标与IVUS测量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。StentViz与IVUS测量的支架最小直径相关性(r = 0.956)优于QCA与IVUS测量的相关性(r=0.776)。StentViz测量的支架最小直径与QCA测量相比,同IVUS测量具有更好的一致性。143幅StentViz图像中支架可视性评价显示,支架显示优82.1%(评分4分),良15.3%(2~3分),差2.6%(0~1分)。 结论 StentViz可显著提高冠状动脉内支架可视性,与QCA相比在测量支架直径方面同IVUS具有更好的相关性和一致性。

参考文献/References:

[1] Biscaglia S, Tumscitz C, Tebaldi M, et al. Enhanced stent visualization systems during PCI: a case series and review of literature[J]. J Cardiol Cases, 2015, 12: 1- 5.
[2] Dishmon DA, Elhaddi A, Packard K, et al. High incidence of inaccurate stent placement in the treatment of coronary aorto- ostial disease[J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2011, 23: 322- 326.
[3] 血管内超声在冠状动脉疾病中应用的中国专家共识专家组. 血管内超声在冠状动脉疾病中应用的中国专家共识(2018)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2018, 46:344- 351.
[4] Wiesinger B, Stutz A, Schmehl J, et al. Comparison of digital flat- panel detector and conventional angiography machines: evaluation of stent detection rates, visibility scores, and dose- area products[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2012, 198: 946- 954.
[5] Fujii K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS, et al. Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus- eluting stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005, 45: 995- 998.
[6] Pal N, Din J, O’kane P. Contemporary management of stent failure: part one[J]. Interv Cardiol, 2019, 14: 10- 16.
[7] 张 蛟, 段媛媛, 魏玉杰, 等. 支架影像增强显影指导冠状动脉开口病变介入治疗临床应用[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2015, 24: 662- 667.
[8] Nicosia A, van der Giessen WJ, Airiian SG, et al. Is intravascular ultrasound after coronary stenting a safe procedure? Three cases of stent damage attributable to ICUS in a tantalum coil stent[J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1997, 40: 265- 270.
[9] Sarno G, Garg S, Gomez- Lara J, et al. Intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency analysis after optimal coronary stenting with initial quantitative coronary angiography guidance: an ATHEROREMO sub- study[J]. EuroIntervention, 2011, 6: 977- 984.
[10] Jin Z, Yang S, Jing L, et al. Impact of stentboost subtract imaging on patient radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 29: 1207- 1213.
[11] Fysal Z, Hyde T, Barnes E, et al. Evaluating stent optimisation technique (StentBoost ?誖) in a dedicated bifurcation stent (the TrytonTM) [J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2014, 15:92- 96.
[12] Gorge G, Haude M, Ge J, et al. Intravascular ultrasound after low and high inflation pressure coronary artery stent implantation[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995, 26: 725- 730.
[13] Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A, Hayase M, et al. Final results of the can routine ultrasound influence stent expansion(CRUISE) study[J]. Circulation, 2000, 102: 523- 530.
[14] Blasini R, Neumann FJ, Schmitt C, et al. Comparison of angio- graphy and intravascular ultrasound for the assessment of lumen size after coronary stent placement: impact of dilation pressures[J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1997, 42: 113- 119.
[15] Mishell JM, Vakharia KT, Ports TA, et al. Determination of adequate coronary stent expansion using StentBoost, a novel fluoroscopic image processing technique[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2007, 69: 84- 93.
[16] Davies AG, Conway D, Reid S, et al. Assessment of coronary stent deployment using computer enhanced X- ray images- validation against intravascular ultrasound and best practice recommendations[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2013, 81: 419- 427.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2019- 09- 15)
(本文编辑:边 佶)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-15