[1]高雅,刘海峰,冯雯,等.MRA诊断颅内动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞术后复发的meta分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2020,29(01):9-14.
　GAO Ya,LIU Haifeng,FENG Wen,et al.Diagnosis of recurrent intracranial aneurysm after coil embolism by MRA: a meta analysis[J].journal interventional radiology,2020,29(01):9-14.
点击复制

MRA诊断颅内动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞术后复发的meta分析()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到：

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
29
期数:
2020年01
页码:
9-14
栏目:
神经介入
出版日期:
2020-02-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Diagnosis of recurrent intracranial aneurysm after coil embolism by MRA: a meta analysis
作者:
高雅; 刘海峰; 冯雯; 张艳利; 王莉莉; 雷军强
Author(s):
GAO Ya;  LIU Haifeng;  FENG Wen;  ZHANG Yanli;  WANG Lili;  LEI Junqiang.
Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730000, China
关键词:
【关键词】　磁共振血管成像; 颅内动脉瘤; 弹簧圈栓塞术; meta分析
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】　目的?系统评价磁共振血管成像（MRA）诊断颅内动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞术（CIA）后复发的应用价值。 方法?计算机系统检索PubMed、EMbase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CBM、WanFang、VIP和CNKI等数据库，收集MRA诊断CIA后复发相关临床研究文献，截止至2018年8月。2名研究人员严格按照纳入和排除标准独立筛选文献和提取数据，并通过QUADAS-2标准评估偏倚风险，Stata 12.0软件作meta分析。 结果?共纳入15篇文献20项研究，包括803例患者894枚可疑复发颅内动脉瘤。Meta分析结果表明，MRA诊断CIA后复发的灵敏度（Sen）汇总为0.85（95%CI 0.77～0.90），特异度（Spe）汇总为0.95（95%CI 0.91～0.98），阳性似然比（PLR）汇总为18.20（95%CI 8.87～37.32），阴性似然比（NLR）汇总为0.16（95%CI 0.10～0.25），诊断比值比（DOR）汇总为113.86（95%CI 44.67～290.18）和受试者特征（ROC）曲线下面积（AUC）为0.96（95%CI 0.93～0.97）。亚组分析结果显示，1.5T MRA Sen和Spe分别大于3.0T MRA（0.87对0.72，P＜0.01；0.97对0.90，
P＜0.05）。 结论?MRA对CIA后复发有明确的诊断价值。

参考文献/References:

1 Bederson JB, Connolly ES, Batjer HH, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart AssociationJ. Stroke, 2009, 40:994-1025.
2 Guillon B， Daumasduport B， Delaroche O， et al. Cerebral ischemia complicating intracranial aneurysm: a warning sign of imminent rupture?J. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2011, 32:1862-1865.
3 van Amerongen MJ, Boogaarts HD, de Vries J， et al. MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysisJ. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2014, 35:1655-1661.
4 Menke J， Schramm P， Sohns JM， et al. Diagnosing flow residuals in coiled cerebral aneurysms by MR angiography: meta-analysisJ. J Neurol, 2014, 261:655-662.
5 Haifeng L， Yongsheng X， Yangqin X， et al. Diagnostic value of 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for detecting intracranial aneurysm: a meta-analysisJ. Neuroradiology, 2017, 59:1083-1092.
6 Cottier JP， Bleuzen-Couthon A， Gallas S， et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: is contrast material necessary in the follow-up with 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?J. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003, 24:1797-1803.
7 Derdeyn CP， Graves VB， Turski PA， et al. MR angiography of saccular aneurysms after treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: preliminary experienceJ. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1997, 18:279-286.
8 Deutschmann HA， Augustin M， Simbrunner J， et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: influence of aneurysm sizeJ. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2007, 28:628-634.
9 Dupre S， Coulthard A . Follow up of coiled intracranial aneurysms with standard resolution and higher resolution magnetic resonance angiographyJ. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2008, 52:57-63.
10 Gauvrit JY， Leclerc X， Caron S， et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiographyJ. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2005, 26:515-521.
11 Leclerc X， Navez JF, Gauvrit JY， et al. Aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiographyJ. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2002, 23:1121-1127.
12 Majoie CB, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ， et al. MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coilsJ. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2005, 26:1349-1356.
13 Pierot L， Portefaix C， Gauvrit JY， et al. Follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T and 1.5T in a large prospective seriesJ. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2012, 33:2162-2166.
14 Sprengers ME， Schaafsma JD， van Rooij WJ， et al. Evaluation of the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography at 3T: is contrast enhancement necessary?J. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2009, 30:1665-1671.
15 Westerlaan HE, van der Vliet AM, Hew JM， et al. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coilsJ. Neuroradiology, 2005, 47:622-629.
16 Wikstrom J, Ronne-Engstrom E, Gal G， et al. Three-dimensional time-of-flight （3D TOF） magnetic resonance angiography （MRA） and contrast-enhanced MRA of intracranial aneurysms treated with platinum coilsJ. Acta Radiol, 2008, 49:190-196.
17 陈文华, 邢?伟, 邱建国, 等. 脑动脉瘤可脱落弹簧圈治疗术后随访MRA与DSA的对比研究J. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2009, 7:4-6.
18 胡锦清, 林?东, 沈建康, 等. 颅内动脉瘤电解可脱性弹簧圈栓塞后MRA随访J. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2005, 4:24-27.
19 宋伟健, 胡?深, 刘欣民. 3.0T TOF-MRA在颅内动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞术后随访中的应用研究J.医学研究杂志, 2017, 46:114-120.
20 徐?钐, 陆建平, 刘?琦,等. 颅内动脉瘤栓塞术后的DCE-MRA随访J. 放射学实践, 2010, 25:136-139.
21 Shellock FG， Gounis M， Wakhloo A . Detachable coil for cerebral aneurysms: in vitro evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 3TJ. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2005, 26:363-366.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴曦,刘建民,黄清海,等.第一代Matrix弹簧圈治疗颅内动脉瘤的安全性及中长期随访结果分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2008,(06):384.
　WU Xi,LIU Jianmin,HUANG Qinghai,et al.Middle and long－term follow－up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Matrix detachable coils[J].journal interventional radiology,2008,(01):384.
[2]杨志刚,刘建民,许奕,等.新型可回撤自膨胀支架在颅内动脉瘤治疗中的应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2008,(07):459.
　YANG Zhigang,LIU Jianmin,XU Yi,et al.Application of a novel retrievable self－expanding stent in intracranial aneurysm treatment[J].journal interventional radiology,2008,(01):459.
[3]潘奇,刘建民,许奕,等.颈内动脉前壁动脉瘤支架结合弹簧圈栓塞术后再出血：病例报道[J].介入放射学杂志,2008,(08):560.
　PAN Qi,LIU Jianmin,XU Yi,et al.Rebleeding after stenting and coil embolization of an aneurysm in anterior wall of the internal carotid artery[J].journal interventional radiology,2008,(01):560.
[4]白卫星,姜喜锋,李天晓,等.Neuroform自膨式支架结合弹簧圈栓塞颅内宽颈动脉瘤[J].介入放射学杂志,2008,(08):539.
　BAI Weixing,JIANG Xifeng,LI Tianxiao,et al.Treatment of intracranial wide neck aneurysm with neuroform self－expanding stent combined with spring coils[J].journal interventional radiology,2008,(01):539.
[5]张鹤,李明华,方淳,等.３．０T时间飞跃法MRA诊断颅内动脉瘤—与DSA对照[J].介入放射学杂志,2008,(09):618.
　ZHANG He,LI Minghua,FANG Chun,et al.Detection of intracranial aneurysm with time－of－flight MRA at ３．０Tesla：comparison with digital subtraction angiography[J].journal interventional radiology,2008,(01):618.
[6]杨志刚,刘建民.单纯网孔支架植入治疗颅内动脉瘤的研究进展[J].介入放射学杂志,2008,(10):745.
　YANG Zhigang,LIU Jianmin.Simple mesh stent placement for treating intracranial aneurysm：progress in research[J].journal interventional radiology,2008,(01):745.
[7]吴曦,刘建民.第一代Martix可吸收聚合物弹簧圈治疗颅内动脉瘤的研制及应用现状[J].介入放射学杂志,2008,(11):828.
　WU Xi,LIU Jianmin.The present development and status of the first generation of Matrix bioabsorbable poly－meric material coil in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms[J].journal interventional radiology,2008,(01):828.
[8]李强,洪波,刘建民.２００９世界神经外科和神经介入大会掠影[J].介入放射学杂志,2010,(02):154.
　LI Qiang,HONG Bo,LIU Jianmin.A glance at Live Interventional Neuroradiology＆Neurosurgery Course２００９[J].journal interventional radiology,2010,(01):154.
[9]黄海东,赵凯,顾建文,等.新型颅内支架Enterprise结合水解脱弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内微小宽颈动脉瘤[J].介入放射学杂志,2010,(02):91.
　HUANG Haidong,ZHAO Kai,GU Jianwen,et al.A novel intracranial Enterprise stent together with coils for the treatment of very small intracranial wide－necked aneurysms[J].journal interventional radiology,2010,(01):91.
[10]施万印,李永东,李明华,等.弹簧圈再栓塞或覆膜支架治疗颅内动脉瘤复发[J].介入放射学杂志,2010,(04):269.
　SHI Wanyin,LI YongDong,LI MingHua,et al.Endovascular treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms with re－coiling or covered stents[J].journal interventional radiology,2010,(01):269.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
（收稿日期：2018-11-26）
（本文编辑：边佶）
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-02-08