[1]史传岗,徐小青.超声引导下C2神经根脉冲射频与C2神经根阻滞治疗颈源性头痛的疗效分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2018,27(05):432-435.
 SHI Chuangang,XU Xiaoqing.Ultrasound- guided C2 ganglion pulsed radiofrequency therapy versus C2 ganglion block therapy for the management of cervicogenic headache: analysis of curative effect[J].journal interventional radiology,2018,27(05):432-435.
点击复制

超声引导下C2神经根脉冲射频与C2神经根阻滞治疗颈源性头痛的疗效分析()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到:

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
27
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
432-435
栏目:
非血管介入
出版日期:
2018-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Ultrasound- guided C2 ganglion pulsed radiofrequency therapy versus C2 ganglion block therapy for the management of cervicogenic headache: analysis of curative effect
作者:
史传岗 徐小青
Author(s):
SHI Chuangang XU Xiaoqing
Pain Clinic, Affiliated Haian Hospital, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province 226600, China
关键词:
【关键词】 颈源性头痛 C2神经根 脉冲射频 神经阻滞
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 比较超声引导下使用吲哚美辛液(类固醇类药物与局麻药的混合液)阻滞C2神经根与C2神经根脉冲射频术治疗颈源性头痛疗效比较。方法 60例颈源性头痛的患者随机分为两组,每组30例。A组使用超声引导下吲哚美辛液C2神经根阻滞,B组采用超声引导下吲哚美辛C2神经根脉冲射频治疗。通过比较治疗前后视觉模拟量表疼痛评分,药物量化量表 -Ⅲ,7点GPE量表(全球感知效应)评估两种治疗方式的有效率。在治疗前和治疗后3、9个月,收集各项参数。结果 治疗后3个月,视觉模拟评分明显下降(A组3.4分,B组3.9分),两组治疗前后比较P均<0.01差异有显著统计学意义。B组疼痛与治疗前评分相比在9个月后仍然下降(P<0.01)。两组在3、9个月,镇痛药物的消耗量显着降低。无严重的并发症。结论 超声引导下C2神经根阻滞及脉冲射频是安全,有效的治疗颈源头痛的方法。C2神经根脉冲射频能提供更长久有效的疗效。

参考文献/References:

[1] Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition[J]. Cephalalgia, 2004, 24(Suppl 1): 9- 160.
[2] Martelletti P, Van Suijlekom H. Cervicogenic headache: practical approaches to therapy[J]. CNS Drugs, 2004, 18: 793- 805.
[3] Harden RN, Weinland SR, Remble TA, et al. Medication Quantification Scale version Ⅲ: update in medication classes and revised detriment weights by survey of American Pain Society Physicians[J]. J Pain, 2005, 6: 364- 371.
[4] Gawel MJ, Rothbart PJ. Occipital nerve block in the management of headache and cervical pain[J]. Cephalalgia, 1992, 12: 9- 13.
[5] Goldberg ME, Schwartzman RJ, Domsky R, et al. Deep cervical plexus block for the treatment of cervicogenic headache[J]. Pain Physician, 2008, 11: 849- 854.
[6] Dieterich M, Pollmann W, Pfaffenrath V. Cervicogenic headache: electronystagmography, perception of verticality and posturography in patients before and after C2- blockade[J]. Cephalalgia, 1993,13: 285- 288.
[7] Acar F, Miller J, Golshani KJ, et al. Pain relief after cervical ganglionectomy(C2 and C3) for the treatment of medically intractable occipital neuralgia[J]. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg,2008, 86: 106- 112.
[8] 贾子普, 罗 芳. 脉冲射频治疗外周神经病理性疼痛模型的研究进展[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2015, 21: 293- 296.
[9] 任 浩, 罗 芳. 脉冲射频治疗慢性伤害感受性疼痛的临床应用进展[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2016, 22: 59- 63.
[10] 张 锴, 朱永强, 朱 旭, 等. 影像引导下腰脊神经内侧支脉冲射频治疗腰椎小关节综合征[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2015, 24: 502- 504.
[11] Navani A, Mahajan G, Kreis P, et al. A case of pulsed radiofrequency lesioning for occipital neuralgia[J]. Pain Med,2006, 7: 453- 456.
[12] Wald JT, Maus TP, Geske JR, et al. Safety and efficacy of CT- guided transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections using a posterior approach[J]. Am J Neuroradiol, 2012, 33: 415- 419.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨茂江,席 豪,秦 泽,等.超声联合C臂引导下等离子消融治疗颈源性头痛——一项回顾性研究[J].介入放射学杂志,2023,32(11):1110.
 YANG Maojiang,XI Hao,QIN Ze,et al.Ultrasound combined with C-arm radiography-guided plasma ablation for cervicogenic headache: a retrospective study[J].journal interventional radiology,2023,32(05):1110.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2017-07-21)
(本文编辑:俞瑞纲)
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-11